X
GO
en-USnb-NO

Arctic foxes were abundant in Varanger and the rest of Finnmark (Norway’s northernmost county) until the beginning of the 20th century. However, thereafter the population sharply declined across the entire Fennoscandia, probably due to overharvesting. Despite strict protection since 1928 (Sweden), 1930 (Norway) and 1940 (Finland), the population did not manage to recover. However, almost nothing was known about the arctic fox in Finnmark at the onset of the project “Fjellrev i Finnmark” in 2004 – the precursor of the COAT Varanger Arctic fox module. It became evident that the species was extirpated from most of Finnmark and that only a few pairs were breeding in the interior of the Varanger Peninsula. On the other hand the red fox – a dominant competitor over the arctic fox – had become very abundant and widespread.

 As part of the Norwegian Environment Agency’s fox conservation program red foxes have been culled on Varanger Peninsula from 2005, and the effect has been assessed within “Fjellrev i Finnmark”. Benefitting from lower red fox abundance and the lemming peaks in 2007 and 2011, arctic foxes reproduced successfully, and the population started to increase. Since 2011, however, there has not been any lemming peaks and only one arctic fox litter has been recorded. We have concluded that the red fox culling at the level carried out in Varanger was not sufficient alone to facilitate an increase in the arctic fox population in Varanger. 

Den occupancy and the number of pups co-vary with the abundance of lemmings.

 

Expected climate impact

The impact of climate change on arctic foxes in Varanger, and in northern Fennoscandia in general, is indirect and likely to be mediated by several pathways.

The larger red fox is an important competitor able to exclude arctic foxes from the most productive denning areas and to monopolize carrion resources in winter. The considerable increase of the red fox population on Varanger observed during the last decades is part of a larger pattern of expansion of boreal generalist predators into the low Arctic. Climate warming and in particular the availability of resource subsidies are promoting this expansion. In Varanger, reindeer carrion is providing the critical subsidies for red foxes in low lemming years. Warmer winters with more rain lead to icing of pastures and may cause increased mortality of semi-domestic reindeer, and thus provide resources for expanding generalist predators. 

Warmer winters and ground icing will also be detrimental for arctic foxes by their negative impact on lemming populations. Indeed, arctic foxes on Varanger depend on lemmings to reproduce, and are not able to raise pups successfully in vole peak years when lemmings are absent, such as in 2015.

Expected effects of climate change and management decisions on arctic fox in Varanger. Warmer winters have a negative impact on arctic fox through two potentially interacting paths: through the decreased availability of lemmings as prey, and through increasing abundance of generalist predators (red fox) which are benefitting from increased availability of ungulate carrion. Both ungulates and red foxes are subject to management actions.

 

Management relevance

Considerable efforts are made in Norway and the rest of Fennoscandia to secure the survival of local arctic foxes. In Varanger, COAT is assessing management options according to the principles of adaptive monitoring /management. The assessment of red fox culling as a stand-alone conservation action was done during 2005 to 2017. In the next phase (starting in 2018), supplemental feeding and release of captive bred arctic foxes together with maintained red fox culling will be implemented in close collaboration with NINA. Knowledge obtained from the arctic fox module is thus directly relevant for the conservation of this endangered species and for better prognosis concerning the future of arctic foxes in changing Fennoscandian ecosystems.

The camera-based monitoring of arctic foxes provide also data on area occupancy of red fox. Moreover, the large samples of culled red foxes provide a rich source of information of red fox genetics, demography and resource use. This allows for investigations that provide an understanding of what supports the expansion of this generalist predators and how the culling affects the population. This knowledge will be used to improve red fox management also in context of other conservation programs in Fennoscandia (Lesser white-fronted goose project).

 

Monitoring methods

The breeding population of arctic foxes is monitored through den surveys as part of the national monitoring program for arctic fox. Known dens are visited every year and inspected for fox activity. Automatic cameras are used to survey the dens, monitor arctic fox activity, determine the number of pups (if the foxes are breeding) and register disturbance by other species (in particular red fox, but also eagles and wolverine).

Late winter is a period of scarcity for tundra predators, where carrion can be an important resource. We use automatic cameras with baits to monitor the scavenger community, including arctic foxes and generalist predators such as red foxes and corvids, in March and April. Methods to estimate the numbers of generalist predators in summer are under development in the ptarmigan module.

Red fox population structure (demographics and genetics) and diet is monitored by collecting data from the carcasses of culled foxes.

 

In summer arctic foxes have a light grey-brown fur, Photo: L. Demongin

Arctic foxes have a thick winter fur with unique isolation properties to keep them warm in arctic winter weather, Photo: Geir Vie

An arctic fox couple on a den on Varanger Peninsula, Photo: COAT automatic camera

In July the pups are already quite big and explore the surroundings of the den,Photo: Timour Belov

Red foxes are generalist predators which can have a negative impact on ground nesting birds such as ptarmigan, Photo: COAT automatic camera

Automatic cameras like this one are sat up in front of a bait and used to monitor the scavenger community in late winter, Photo: John-André Henden

Picture from a baited automatic camera showing two typical arctic predators, the snowy owl and the arctic fox, Photo: COAT automatic camera

 

Module members

Module leader
Researcher,UiT - Arctic university of Norway
dorothee.ehrich@uit.no
Professor, UiT - Arctic university of Norway
Associate Professor, UiT - Arctic university of Norway
Advisor, UiT - Arctic university of Norway
Researcher, UiT - Arctic university of Norway
Researcher, Norwegian Polar Institute

 

Selected papers

Ims RA, Killengreen ST, Ehrich D, Flagstad Ø, Hamel S, Henden JA, Jensvoll I, Yoccoz NG.
Ecosystem drivers of an Arctic fox population at the western fringe of the Eurasian Arctic.
2017. Arctic Polar Research 36,sup1.
Killengreen ST, Stromseng E, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA.
How ecological neighbourhoods influence the structure of the scavenger guild in low arctic tundra.
2012. Diversity and Distributions 18: 563-574.
Killengreen ST, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Brathen KA, Henden JA, Schott T.
Structural characteristics of a low Arctic tundra ecosystem and the retreat of the Arctic fox.
2007. Biological Conservation 134: 459-472.
Killengreen ST, Lecomte N, Ehrich D, Schott T, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA.
The importance of marine vs. human-induced subsidies in the maintenance of an expanding mesocarnivore in the arctic tundra.
2011. Journal of Animal Ecology 80: 1049-1060.
Henden JA, Stien A, Bardsen BJ, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA.
Community-wide mesocarnivore response to partial ungulate migration.
2014. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 1525-1533.